Check out the newest way to compare different models for a task/agent harness: AutoEvals
Direct Evals

Eval

Run a Model Comparison

Run your eval dataset through multiple models and score the outputs against your rubric.

Pick a rubric, pick a dataset, pick models, and run. Inference platform handles execution and scoring.

Step by step

Select a rubric

Choose the rubric that defines your quality criteria.

Select an eval dataset

Choose the dataset containing your evaluation samples. This can come from captured traffic or a JSONL upload.

Select models

Pick one or more models to evaluate. You can choose from a wide range of models including OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source, or your own custom trained models.

Run the eval

Each sample from the dataset runs through each selected model. Each output gets scored by the LLM judge using your rubric.

Eval setup flow showing rubric, dataset, and model selection in the dashboard.

How the math works

The eval is a cross-product of samples and models:

  • 10 samples across 3 models = 30 inference outputs
  • Each output gets scored = 30 judge calls
  • Results: per-sample scores for every model

Next steps

Once the eval completes, go to Read the Results to interpret the comparison view.

On this page